This isn't fandom related. Just something I'm wondering that's probably completely pointless to post on a Saturday night right before I leave for work, but I'm going to do it anyway.
With regard to statcounters and pingbacks.
Firstly, I don't think LJ has worked the kinks out of their pingback feature yet. On my last two big posts I posted them privately in my journal while I worked on them and then made a current post linking back to them so the dates would be accurate for future reference. I know that's anal, but whatever. Anyway, I got pingback notifications for the links I posted in my own journal to links further down in my own journal. I found that amusing. But on both those entries, I have found (by browsing comms and other journals) that those posts have been linked back to many times and I have only received a notification for one. The posts I found where I was linked were at least public enough for me to read, so I don't think it's an issue of them being linked in a locked post or anything. Anyone care to venture what's up with that? Just an LJ glitch?
And statcounters.
I have a few. The most obvious one is the sitemeter in my sidebar, which y'all can't see without going to my actual journal page since I have custom comment pages disabled. Here's the thing. Every week I get a little update on that. And the numbers are downright puny.
For example, it said, on the day I posted that fic, that I had 72 hits to my whole journal. o_O I also have an invisible counter on certain entries. The invisible counter said I had over 1600 hits that day, just to those two entries. Mostly to the one, but a few to the other.
Here's what I think the issue is. I think when I set up the sitemeter, I set it up to record only new or unique hits. I did that because I know most of the hits on my journal on days when I'm not posting fic are me. I don't mind it counting me once, but I don't want to be counted twenty times in one day. I think I assumed, (wrongly) that it would record unique hits within a certain time frame, like within 24 hours or so. I now believe it is only recording unique hits altogether. So, once you've been to my journal for anything, you're counted and will never be counted again.
Could that be the case? I just cannot figure out any other reason why I get so few hits on my sitemeter.
On the one hand, it looks bad, lol, in case people actually look at that and compare.
On the other, I get 38 unique hits a day on average. And over 14000 unique computers have visited my LJ.
So, um, my question is, what statcounters do y'all use, and which do you find the most helpful?
That is all. Going to work now.
With regard to statcounters and pingbacks.
Firstly, I don't think LJ has worked the kinks out of their pingback feature yet. On my last two big posts I posted them privately in my journal while I worked on them and then made a current post linking back to them so the dates would be accurate for future reference. I know that's anal, but whatever. Anyway, I got pingback notifications for the links I posted in my own journal to links further down in my own journal. I found that amusing. But on both those entries, I have found (by browsing comms and other journals) that those posts have been linked back to many times and I have only received a notification for one. The posts I found where I was linked were at least public enough for me to read, so I don't think it's an issue of them being linked in a locked post or anything. Anyone care to venture what's up with that? Just an LJ glitch?
And statcounters.
I have a few. The most obvious one is the sitemeter in my sidebar, which y'all can't see without going to my actual journal page since I have custom comment pages disabled. Here's the thing. Every week I get a little update on that. And the numbers are downright puny.
For example, it said, on the day I posted that fic, that I had 72 hits to my whole journal. o_O I also have an invisible counter on certain entries. The invisible counter said I had over 1600 hits that day, just to those two entries. Mostly to the one, but a few to the other.
Here's what I think the issue is. I think when I set up the sitemeter, I set it up to record only new or unique hits. I did that because I know most of the hits on my journal on days when I'm not posting fic are me. I don't mind it counting me once, but I don't want to be counted twenty times in one day. I think I assumed, (wrongly) that it would record unique hits within a certain time frame, like within 24 hours or so. I now believe it is only recording unique hits altogether. So, once you've been to my journal for anything, you're counted and will never be counted again.
Could that be the case? I just cannot figure out any other reason why I get so few hits on my sitemeter.
On the one hand, it looks bad, lol, in case people actually look at that and compare.
On the other, I get 38 unique hits a day on average. And over 14000 unique computers have visited my LJ.
So, um, my question is, what statcounters do y'all use, and which do you find the most helpful?
That is all. Going to work now.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 11:15 pm (UTC)And then I think the mother of all trackers out there is Google Analytics. It's geared towards collecting data to target ads, so it does a lot more than just track visitors. My understanding is they store something in a computer's registry and tracks user behaviour based on that machine identifier. It's actually kind of sketch, because they can truly log everything you do on your machine online as long as the sites you're on use the GA tracker...
Unfortunately, I don't have any suggestions for statcounters. One of my old sites has the freetracker from http://extremetracking.com/ and a custom php code one off the webserver. I don't know if there are better ones out there now; that site of mine is from like 9 years ago...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 11:55 pm (UTC)As for the statcounters I just figured they were more trouble than they were worth for my poor untechnological brain. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 09:49 pm (UTC)I also like LJ-toys, because it also tells you the usernames of the hits if it can figure them out. But I know a lot of people are squicked out by the fact that it exists, so I only put the code in certain entries. (You'd be surprised the people who read your journal and wouldn't give you the time of day outside of it.) But it's not entirely accurate. I can look at the IPs and have five different IPs all credited with the same username. So, yeah...
And don't worry about not getting any pings. Like I said, they're not working very well. I also kinda wonder why I don't get pings every time I crosspost in a community. *ponders*
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 11:09 pm (UTC)I know how to check my stats on FF and it is interesting and it would be cool to know here but unless they can figure out a way where I don't have to set it up then I probably won't ever figure it out.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 07:25 pm (UTC)I don't know if that link will work, but you should be able to google it at least. I didn't set up the whole icon set like they suggest. Wayyyyy too complicated. I just take the little code they give you for individual bugs and paste it into posts that I want to monitor. It gives a pretty cool feedback including usernames, though they'll tell you right out that the usernames are a guess and not necessarily accurate.
Yeah, copy the link and paste it into a google search.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 07:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 09:52 pm (UTC)Besides, now that I know it's tracking only unique IPs, I'm kinda fascinated by where these 38 new people a day are coming from. I wonder what the heck I'm doing to lure them in, especially since most of them seem to be going directly to my journal and not to any particular page. *is thinky*
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 07:28 pm (UTC)Pingbacks are supposed to send you a little notice every time someone links to one of your posts. It's helpful for finding out if you're recced or being wanked about somewhere, LOL. But like I said, they're not really working right at all.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-06 11:32 am (UTC)xoxoxoxoxoxo
no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 07:28 pm (UTC)